This article is part of the series Aromatase inhibitors in reproductive biology and endocrinology.

Open Access Review

Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal endometriosis

Nikolaos P Polyzos1, Human M Fatemi2, Apostolos Zavos1, Grigoris Grimbizis3, Dimitra Kyrou3, Juan-Garcia Velasco4, Paul Devroey2, Basil Tarlatzis3 and Evangelos G Papanikolaou25*

Author Affiliations

1 OB-GYN University Clinic, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece

2 University Hospital, Dutch speaking Free University of Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

3 First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Perifereiaki Odos Thessalonikis-N. Efkarpias 564 29, Thessaloniki, Greece

4 IVI, Madrid, Avenida Talgo, 68, 28023 Madrid, Spain

5 Human Reproduction and Genetics Foundation, Adrianoupoleos 6, 55133 Kalamaria, Thessaloniki, Greece

For all author emails, please log on.

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2011, 9:90  doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-90

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.rbej.com/content/9/1/90


Received:24 December 2010
Accepted:21 June 2011
Published:21 June 2011

© 2011 Polyzos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Postmenopausal endometriosis is a rare clinical condition. The diagnosis and treatment of an endometriotic lesion in postmenopausal women is complicated. First line treatment choice should be surgical, given that there is a potential risk of malignancy. Medical treatment may be considered as second line or as an alternate first line treatment whenever surgery is contradicted and aims to alter the hormonal pathway leading to endometriosis progress. Different hormonal regimens have been administered to these patients, with conflicting however results. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) represent one of the most recently used drugs for postmenopausal endometriosis. Clinical data for the use of (AIs) in postmenopausal patients is scarce. Up to date only 5 case reports are available regarding the use of these agents in postmenopausal women. Although definite conclusions may be premature, AIs appear to considerably improve patients' symptoms and reduce endometriotic lesions size. Nonetheless the subsequent induced reduction in estrogen production, leads to certain short-term and long-term adverse effects. Despite the limited available data, AIs appear to represent a new promising method which may improve symptoms and treat these patients, either as first line treatment, when surgery is contraindicated or as a second line for recurrences following surgical treatment. However, careful monitoring of patients' risk profile and further research regarding long-term effects and side-effects of these agents is essential prior implementing them in everyday clinical practice.

Review

Endometriosis is a clinical condition mainly seen among women of reproductive age. Nonetheless, it may also affect post-menopausal women [1], with a prevalence varying from 2 to 5% [2]. In 1942 Haydon reported a 78-years-old patient with endometriosis, [3], whereas in another study 138 endometriosis patients were reported to be 2 or more years post-menopausal [4]. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) represent one of the most recently used drugs for postmenopausal endometriosis. They were first used for the treatment of postmenopausal, estrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer due to their ability to reduce estrogen production through inhibition of cytochrome P450.

Pathogenesis of postmenopausal endometriosis

Endometriosis is always estrogen dependent. While in premenopausal women the ovaries are the main source of estrogen production, in postmenopausal patients estrogens are derived either from exogenous administration, or from endogenous extraovarian production. Several reports have linked postmenopausal endometriosis with hormone therapy [5,6]. However, estrogen production during menopause may be derived from extra-ovarian sources such as the adrenal glands, the skin, the endometrial stroma, and the adipose tissue [7], with the latter probably accounting the larger part of estrogen production through aromatation of adrenal gland androgen [8].

Treatment options for patients with postmenopausal endometriosis

First line treatment for endometriosis in postmenopausal patients should be surgical. The rationale behind such an approach is that any postmenopausal mass has a potential risk of malignancy and therefore should be removed [9]. On the other hand, the risk of malignant transformation of endometriosis may be increased[10]. However, despite the fact that surgical approach should be the first line treatment, recurrence rates after surgery are increased [11,12]and therefore an effective second line treatment for these patients is mandatory. Furthermore, given that operation may not always be feasible, an alternative first line treatment should be considered.

Medical treatment aims to alter the hormonal pathway leading to endometriosis progress. The use of GnRH agonists, progestins or danazol, intend through a step-wise pathway to decrease estrogen production, or alter the estrogenic effect. Yet, considering that treatment with either GnRH agonists [7]or progestins appears be ineffective in postmenopausal patients [11], the need for alternative drugs to reduce estrogen production is mandatory.

AIs may be considered an efficient treatment modality for these patients since, compared to other hormonal therapies such as GnRH agonists, they have the ability to further block extraovarian estrogen production which is the main estrogen source for these women.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs)

Aromatase Inhibitors were first used for the treatment of postmenopausal, estrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer [13]. Their ability to reduce estrogen production is through inhibition of cytochrome P450, a key enzyme that catalyzes conversion of andostenendione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol[14].

Letrozole and anastrozole are triazole derivatives that are reversible, competitive AIs and, at doses of 1-5 mg/day, inhibit estrogen levels by 97% to more than 99% [15], whereas exemestane is a steroidal, irreversible inhibitor that binds to the active site of the aromatase enzyme and inactivates it effectively at a dose of 25 mg/day. AIs may offer a new alternative for postmenopausal patients with endometriosis through the alteration of mechanisms involved in molecular development of endometriosis [16].

Evidence regarding the use of AIs in premenopausal patients is far more extensive compared to postmenopausal women, mainly due to the considerable difference in the prevalence of disease among these groups of patients. Nonetheless, it appears that AIs in premenopausal endometriosis, represent only a part of the therapeutic plan. Previous reports have raised arguments regarding the proposed beneficial effect of AIs in these women, suggesting that this may be attributed to the combined use with other agents (e.g. GnRH agonists, danazol, oral contraceptives (OCs), progestins) [17]. The main reason for these objections is the fact that in premenopausal women the main source of estrogens is the ovary. Consequently, premenopausal endometriosis is often successfully suppressed by estrogen deprivation with GnRH analogs or the induction of surgical menopause [18]. Therefore, in there women AIs may only be justified when GnRH analogs fail to control the disease through the elimination of estradiol secreted by the ovary [18], probably due to the presence of significant estradiol production that continues in the adipose tissue, skin, and endometriotic implant per se during the GnRH agonist treatment.

On the contrary, in postmenopausal women the only estrogen activity is related to the production from extraovarian sources and consequently AIs appear to be effective in treating severe endometriosis through blockade of extraovarian estrogen production. This is the key for the efficacy of AIs in the management of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. At the moment 3rd generation of AIs are used for the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients [18]. Hence, given that they successfully control breast cancer disease in postmenopausal women though the reduction in circulating estrogens [13], it is likely that they may also have effect in postmenopausal endometriosis. Blockage of aromatase activity derived from extraovarian sites with an aromatase inhibitor may keep a larger number of patients in remission for longer periods of time. Furthermore, the effect of AIs in postmenopausal endometriosis may even be greater given that they are involved in the pathologic pathway within the endometriotic lesions. An intracrine mechanism production of large quantities of estrogen has been proposed within the ectopic tissue endometriotic cells. Endometriotic implants although histologically similar to eutopic endometrium, appear to be different in their molecular base and this may give rise to extreme production and impaired metabolism of estradiol [8,11,18,19]. Therefore, AIs can theoretically markedly reduce this production and thus decrease the size of the lesions.

Available evidence regarding the use of AIs for the treatment of postmenopausal endometriosis

Although a prospective randomized trial showed that AIs in combination with GnRH analogues increased the pain-free interval and decreased symptoms recurrence rates following surgery in premenopausal patients with severe endometriosis [20], clinical data for the use of (AIs) in postmenopausal patients is limited.

Up to date only 5 case reports are available regarding the use of AIs in postmenopausal women and thus definite conclusions may be premature (table 1). Patients' age ranged from 47 to 61 years old. The majority of them had total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at earlier age. Two patients had received hormonal replacement therapy during menopause, one until recurrence of endometriosis [11]and one more than 3 years prior recurrence[7]. The majority of women had been previously treated for endometriosis with either surgery, or GnRH agonists or progestins. Finally, all cases involved patients with either surgical [7,11,21,22] or natural [23]menopause.

Table 1. Studies regarding the use of aromatase inhibitors for postmenopausal endometriosis

AIs and symptoms relief in postmenopausal patients

In all treated patients, administration of letrozole or anastrozole appeared to improve pain related to endometriosis, either when treatment was administered for 4 months or for up to 15 months. Furthermore, letrozole appeared to improve all the other symptoms, such as urinary tract and bowel symptoms, whenever these systems were affected by endometriosis. Nonetheless, exemestane did not improve endometriosis symptoms in one patient; when in the same patient letrozole was subsequently administered, a significant beneficial effect on symptoms relief was observed. Although one may interpret this observation as a potential difference between these two agents' efficacy, this should be interpreted with caution, given the short term of administration of exemestane [21].

Besides subjective improvement, related to patients' reported symptoms, letrozole or anastrozole has shown a beneficial effect in quantitative parameters such as the endometriotic lesions size. In all of the patients in which clinical manifestation of the disease was the presence of endometriotic masses, AIs significantly reduced the size of the lesions as measured by imaging techniques.

The only symptom that appeared not to improve even 15 months after the administration of anastrozole was ureteral endometriosis. However this patient suffered from extensive ureteral fibrosis. Thus, a potential explanation for this lack of effect of treatment may be the inability of these agents to improve ureteral obstruction, since fibrosis does not respond to hormonal therapy [24,25].

Side effects of AIs-how can they be minimized in patients with endometriosis

Despite the fact that AIs appear to considerably improve patients' symptoms and reduce endometriotic lesions size, their use and the subsequent induced reduction in estrogen production, leads to certain short-term and long-term adverse effects. Hot flushes, vaginal dryness, arthralgias, decreased bone mineral density, have been reported [26]. However, the most important risk associated with AIs administration is osteoporosis and an increased fracture rate [26]. Long term use of AIs in the adjuvant setting has been associated with a significantly higher bone fracture rate compared to tamoxifen especially in patients with advanced age, smoking history, osteoporosis at baseline, previous bone fracture, and previous hormonal replacement therapy[27].

Among the patients treated up to date with AIs for postmenopausal endometriosis, only one reported hot flushes after 4 months of letrozole administration, as side-effect of medication; co-administration of micronized estradiol 0,5 mg daily improved hot flushes and no pain recurrence occurred over the following 4 months.

To reduce the risk of osteoporosis in high-risk patients, bisphosphonates may be co-administered with AIs during long-term treatment. For breast cancer patients the American Society of Clinical Oncologists recommends that bone mineral density screening should be repeated annually in all patients receiving aromatase inhibitor adjuvant therapy, and bisphosphonate therapy should be initiated when the Bone Mineral Density Measurement which is commonly reported in terms of T-score, are -2.5 or lower [28]. Among the available studies, co-administration of biphosphonates (aledronate) was given in two patients; still one of them reported letrozole associated bone loss with bone mineral density marginally reduced following 9 months treatment with 1 mg anastrozole.

Conclusions

Postmenopausal endometriosis is a rare clinical condition which may significantly impair patients' quality of life. Despite the considerably limited available data, AIs may be a new promising method which could potentially improve symptoms and treat these patients, either as first line treatment, when surgery is contraindicated or as a second line for recurrences following surgical treatment. The crucial however question remains whether such an approach has the potential to be an effective long term treatment, given that current reports involve few patients with a limited follow-up. Furthermore another serious issue is whether AIs truly is a cost-benefit method. Taking into account that treatment with AIs may significantly impair bone mineral density and increase the rate of bone fractures, it is intriguing to clarify whether the benefits gained from this treatment modality outnumber the harms in patients with postmenopausal endometriosis. Furthermore, prior administrating these agents in patients with postmenopausal endometriosis considering patient's risk profile may be the most stepwise approach.

List of abbreviations

AIs: Aromatase inhibitors; MPA: medroxyprogesterone

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

NPP wrote the manuscript, HMF wrote the manuscript, AZ, wrote the manuscript, GG wrote the manuscript, DK, reviewed the literature, JGV, revised the manuscript, PD revised the manuscript, BT revised the manuscript, EGP revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ: Endometriosis: treatment strategies.

    Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003, 997:229-239. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Punnonen R, Klemi PJ, Nikkanen V: Postmenopausal endometriosis.

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1980, 11:195-200. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Guy JM: Edgar Haydon (1859-1942): general practitioner and radium pioneer.

    J Med Biogr 2009, 17:127-134. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Kempers RD, Dockerty MB, Hunt AB, Symmonds RE: Significant postmenopausal endometriosis.

    Surg Gynecol Obstet 1960, 111:348-356. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  5. Goumenou AG, Chow C, Taylor A, Magos A: Endometriosis arising during estrogen and testosterone treatment 17 years after abdominal hysterectomy: a case report.

    Maturitas 2003, 46:239-241. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Sesti F, Vettraino G, Pietropolli A, Marziali M, Piccione E: Vesical and vaginal recurrent endometriosis in postmenopause following estrogen replacement therapy.

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005, 118:265-266. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Fatemi HM, Al-Turki HA, Papanikolaou EG, Kosmas L, De Sutter P, Devroey P: Successful treatment of an aggressive recurrent post-menopausal endometriosis with an aromatase inhibitor.

    Reprod Biomed Online 2005, 11:455-457. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Ackerman GE, Smith ME, Mendelson CR, MacDonald PC, Simpson ER: Aromatization of androstenedione by human adipose tissue stromal cells in monolayer culture.

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981, 53:412-417. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Brinton LA, Gridley G, Persson I, Baron J, Bergqvist A: Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis.

    Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 176:572-579. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Borgfeldt C, Andolf E: Cancer risk after hospital discharge diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts and endometriosis.

    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:395-400. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Takayama K, Zeitoun K, Gunby RT, Sasano H, Carr BR, Bulun SE: Treatment of severe postmenopausal endometriosis with an aromatase inhibitor.

    Fertil Steril 1998, 69:709-713. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Berlanda N, Vercellini P, Fedele L: The outcomes of repeat surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis.

    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010, 22:320-325. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Polyzos NP, Ioannidis JP: Survival with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators versus standard hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: meta-analysis.

    J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:1285-1291. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Meresman GF, Bilotas M, Abello V, Buquet R, Tesone M, Sueldo C: Effects of aromatase inhibitors on proliferation and apoptosis in eutopic endometrial cell cultures from patients with endometriosis.

    Fertil Steril 2005, 84:459-463. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, Wolff AC, Pritchard KI, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, Gelber R, Edge SB, Gralow J, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004.

    J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:619-629. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Attar E, Bulun SE: Aromatase inhibitors: the next generation of therapeutics for endometriosis?

    Fertil Steril 2006, 85:1307-1318. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Vercellini P, Crosignani P, Somigliana E, Vigano P, Frattaruolo MP, Fedele L: 'Waiting for Godot': a commonsense approach to the medical treatment of endometriosis.

    Hum Reprod 2011, 26:3-13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Bulun SE, Imir G, Utsunomiya H, Thung S, Gurates B, Tamura M, Lin Z: Aromatase in endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata.

    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2005, 95:57-62. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Bulun SE, Yang S, Fang Z, Gurates B, Tamura M, Sebastian S: Estrogen production and metabolism in endometriosis.

    Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002, 955:75-85.

    discussion 86-78, 396-406

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Soysal S, Soysal ME, Ozer S, Gul N, Gezgin T: The effects of post-surgical administration of goserelin plus anastrozole compared to goserelin alone in patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective randomized trial.

    Hum Reprod 2004, 19:160-167. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Mousa NA, Bedaiwy MA, Casper RF: Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of severe endometriosis.

    Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:1421-1423. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Bohrer J, Chen CC, Falcone T: Persistent bilateral ureteral obstruction secondary to endometriosis despite treatment with an aromatase inhibitor.

    Fertil Steril 2008, 90:e2007-2009.

    2004

    OpenURL

  23. Sasson IE, Taylor HS: Aromatase inhibitor for treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall endometrioma in a postmenopausal woman.

    Fertil Steril 2009, 92:e1171-1174.

    1170

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Yohannes P: Ureteral endometriosis.

    J Urol 2003, 170:20-25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Bergamini V, Bolis P: Management of ureteral endometriosis: areas of controversy.

    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007, 19:319-324. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Duffy S, Jackson TL, Lansdown M, Philips K, Wells M, Pollard S, Clack G, Coibion M, Bianco AR: The ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial: first results of the endometrial sub-protocol following 2 years of treatment.

    Hum Reprod 2006, 21:545-553. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Rabaglio M, Sun Z, Price KN, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Hawle H, Thurlimann B, Mouridsen H, Campone M, Forbes JF, Paridaens RJ, et al.: Bone fractures among postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer treated with 5 years of letrozole or tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 trial.

    Ann Oncol 2009, 20:1489-1498. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  28. Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, Gralow J, Yee GC, Janjan NA, Cauley JA, Blumenstein BA, Albain KS, Lipton A, Brown S: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer.

    J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:4042-4057. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL