Skip to main content
Download PDF

Administration of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa combined in a single injection: a feasibility assessment

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 7, Article number: 48 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gonadotrophins are routinely administered in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment protocols. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; follitropin alfa) and recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH; lutropin alfa) can be administered individually or in a fixed combination. The ability to vary the FSH to LH dose ratio in a single injection without compromising the bioactivity of either gonadotrophin or generating losses of active principle is important for physicians and patients alike.

Methods

This study investigated whether follitropin alfa (GONAL-f (R)), as lyophilized powder for reconstitution or solution from the GONAL-f (R) (filled-by-mass [FbM]) Prefilled Pen, could be used to reconstitute Pergoveris TM (follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU) lyophilized powder. In Ratio Groups 1 and 2, the r-hFSH:r-hLH ratio was 3:1; in Ratio Groups 3 and 4, the ratios of r-hFSH:r-hLH were 5:1 and 8:1, respectively. The protein content and bioactivity of each mixed solution were evaluated. The r-hFSH and r-hLH content was determined using reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. The biological activity of r-hFSH and r-hLH was assessed using the Steelman-Pohley and Van Hell in vivo bioassays in rats, respectively.

Results

Follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder could be successfully mixed with follitropin alfa 75 IU FbM solution that was either reconstituted from lyophilized powder or injected directly from the prefilled pen to create solutions with ratios of r-hFSH and r-hLH from 3:1 to 8:1. The measured content of r-hFSH and r-hLH corresponded favourably with the target protein content in Ratio Groups 1–4. The in vivo target and measured bioactivity of r-hFSH and r-hLH were also closely matched in all Ratio Groups.

Conclusion

Follitropin alfa lyophilized powder or solution can be accurately mixed with follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder to enable physicians to administer ratios of r-hFSH and r-hLH in the IU range from 3:1 to 8:1. Mixing of recombinant formulations offers flexibility for patients receiving follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa for ART protocols in clinical practice.

Background

Gonadotrophins are routinely administered in many assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment protocols. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) induces the recruitment and development of ovarian follicles and luteinizing hormone (LH) increases oestradiol secretion by the follicles and is responsible for final oocyte maturation and subsequent ovulation [1]. Recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH; follitropin alfa) and LH (r-hLH; lutropin alfa) can be administered independently or in combination, in accordance with individual patient needs.

Various injection devices have been developed to simplify administration of gonadotrophins and allow patients to self-administer treatment [2]. Follitropin alfa (filled-by-mass [FbM]) is provided in ready-to-use, prefilled pens that are designed specifically for self-administration by patients [2, 3]. The GONAL-f® (FbM) Prefilled Pen is available in three multi-dose formulations (300, 450 and 900 IU) and does not require reconstitution or cartridge assembly into the injection device, thereby reducing the number of steps before injection and helping to ensure an accurate and correct dose [2, 3]. Follitropin alfa (FbM) is also available in single (75 IU) and multidose (450 and 1050 IU) vials of lyophilized powder for reconstitution. The variety of commercially available preparations accommodates individualized dosing for diverse protocols for ovulation induction or controlled ovarian stimulation.

r-hFSH and r-hLH have been recently combined in a single product (Pergoveris™ [follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU]), thereby allowing administration of both gonadotrophins in a convenient single injection [4]. Follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU is indicated for the stimulation of follicular development in women who are infertile because of severe endogenous FSH and LH deficiencies [4].

An increasing number of physicians are requesting information on the feasibility of mixing the currently available recombinant gonadotrophin products. Therefore, we evaluated the protein content and in vivo bioactivity of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa in rats after mixing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder with follitropin alfa as 75 IU FbM lyophilized powder or solution from the GONAL-f® (FbM) Prefilled Pen.

Methods

Materials

Commercially-available formulations of recombinant gonadotrophins were tested: follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU [Pergoveris™] lyophilized powder; follitropin alfa (GONAL-f®) as 75 IU FbM lyophilized powder (in 3 mL glass vials) supplied by Laboratoires Serono S.A. (Aubonne, Switzerland) and 900 IU GONAL-f® (FbM) Prefilled Pen supplied by Merck Serono S.p.A. (Bari, Italy).

Water for injection (WFI) was supplied by Galenica Senese (Siena, Italy). Reagents used for the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis were supplied by Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva (Switzerland).

Gonadotrophin mixing procedures

Follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU and follitropin alfa were mixed according to the procedures described below to provide different ratios of r-hFSH and r-hLH ranging from 3:1 to 8:1 (Table 1). In Ratio Groups 1 and 2, the r-hFSH:r-hLH ratio was 3:1, whereas the ratios of r-hFSH:r-hLH in Ratio Groups 3 and 4 were 5:1 and 8:1, respectively. A single stock solution was prepared for each Ratio Group (1–4) on study day 1 and stored at 2–8°C for the duration of the administration period. In all cases, follitropin alfa solution was added to follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder using plastic syringes, and the final reconstituted volume was approximately 1 mL.

Table 1 r-hFSH and r-hLH mixing scheme*
Full size table

Ratio Group 1: 75 IU in 1 mL follitropin alfa (75 IU) plus follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU (r-hFSH:r-hLH ratio 3:1)

Step 1: A vial containing follitropin alfa 75 IU lyophilized powder was reconstituted with 1 mL of WFI using a 1 mL plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" needle. Step 2: The vial was gently mixed until the cake was completely dissolved. Step 3: The solution was withdrawn from the vial of follitropin alfa using a 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle. Step 4: The solution was then transferred into the vial containing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder. Step 5: The vial was gently mixed until the cake was completely dissolved. The needle used for withdrawing was replaced with a 27 GA × 1/2" needle and the solution was injected into a container.

Ratio Group 2: 75 IU in 0.125 mL follitropin alfa (900 IU GONAL-f®[FbM] Prefilled Pen) plus follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU (r-hFSH:r-hLH ratio 3:1)

Step 1: 0.125 mL (75 IU) of follitropin alfa was injected from a 900 IU prefilled pen into a vial containing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder. Step 2: 0.875 mL of WFI was added to the vial containing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder and follitropin alfa using a 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle. The methodology was completed according to Step 5, Ratio Group 1 (above).

Ratio Group 3: 225 IU in 1 mL follitropin alfa (75 IU) plus follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU (r-FSH:r-LH ratio 5:1)

Step 1: A vial containing follitropin alfa 75 IU lyophilized powder was reconstituted with 1 mL of WFI using a 1 mL plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" needle. The vial was gently mixed until the cake was completely dissolved. Step 2: The solution was withdrawn from the first vial of follitropin alfa 75 IU and transferred into a second vial also containing follitropin alfa 75 IU using the 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle. The second vial was gently mixed until the cake was completely dissolved. Step 3: The solution was withdrawn from the second vial of follitropin alfa 75 IU and transferred into a third vial containing follitropin alfa 75 IU lyophilized powder using the 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle. The third vial was gently mixed until the cake was completely dissolved. Step 4: As much solution as possible was withdrawn from the third vial of follitropin alfa 75 IU using a 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle and transferred into a vial of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder. The methodology was completed according to Step 5, Ratio Group 1 (above).

Ratio Group 4: 450 IU in 0.75 mL follitropin alfa (900 IU GONAL-f®[FbM] Prefilled Pen) plus follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU (r-FSH:r-LH ratio 8:1)

Step 1: 0.75 mL (450 IU) of follitropin alfa was injected from a 900 IU prefilled pen into a vial containing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder. Step 2: Using a 1 mL graduated plastic syringe with 22 GA × 1" removable needle, 0.25 mL of WFI was added to the vial containing follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder and follitropin alfa. The methodology was completed according to Step 5, Ratio Group 1 (above).

Analytical methods

The protein content and in vivo bioactivity of each r-hFSH and r-hLH solution were measured after mixing.

Determination of the protein content of r-hFSH and r-hLH mixed solutions

The target protein content of each mixed solution was calculated using the following conversion factors: 150 IU r-hFSH corresponds with 10.8 mcg; 75 IU r-hLH corresponds with 3 mcg. Chromatography of the prepared solutions was performed on a reverse-phase-HPLC (RP-HPLC, Waters) column (source: 5RPC 4.6 × 150 mm), using a gradient of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/water. The two subunits of r-hFSH and r-hLH were separated and the peaks relative to the beta subunits of each protein were quantified as a proportion of the beta subunits of their respective standards.

In vivobioassay for r-hFSH biological activity

The in vivo bioactivity of FSH was assessed according to current US and European Pharmacopoeias by the traditional Steelman-Pohley human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) augmentation assay (1953), which measures ovarian hypertrophy following administration of exogenous FSH (in combination with hCG) to immature female rats [5].

Animal groups of five, 21-day-old female Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan-Nossan, Italy) weighing 42–52 g were used for each bioassay. The rats were injected with both the follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa mixed solution and hCG (Ovitrelle®) for 3 days; they received one dose on day 1 and two doses on days 2 and 3. On day 4, the rats were sacrificed and their ovaries were removed, excised of fat and connective tissue and weighed. Each sample was tested in triplicate (using three independent replicates). The internal Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva Standard was previously calibrated against the National Institute for Biological Standard and Controls (NIBSC) International Standard (recombinant follicle stimulating hormone, IS 92/642).

In vivobioassay for r-hLH biological activity

The in vivo bioactivity of LH was assessed according to US and European Pharmacopoeias following the Van Hell seminal vesicle weight gain bioassay [6].

Animal groups of five, 21-day-old male SPF Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan-Nossan) weighing 42–52 g were used. Rats were injected with one subcutaneous daily dose (0.5 mL) of the follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU and follitropin alfa mixed solution for 4 days. On day 5, 96 hours after the first administration, the animals were sacrificed and the seminal vesicles were removed and weighed. Each sample was tested in triplicate. The internal Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva Standard was previously calibrated against the NIBSC International Standard (recombinant luteinizing hormone, IS 71/264).

Animal care

Animal studies were authorized by the Italian Health Authority (Ministero della Salute) in accordance with the government decree D.L. 116/92 and the 86/609/CEE directive. All animals were kept in 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark conditions, and each experimental animal group was housed in separate cages. Rats were given access to food and water ad libitum throughout the study.

Results

Follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder could be mixed successfully with follitropin alfa 75 IU FbM solution that was either reconstituted from lyophilized powder or injected directly from the GONAL-f® (FbM) Prefilled Pen. Using these commercially available formulations, it was possible to create solutions with ratios of r-hFSH and r-hLH in the range from 3:1 to 8:1. Furthermore, no practical issues such as needle bending were experienced during the addition of follitropin alfa solution from the prefilled pen to follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder.

The r-hFSH and r-hLH content and in vivo bioactivity of mixed solutions of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder and follitropin alfa are presented in Table 2. The measured protein content of r-hFSH and r-hLH corresponded closely with the target amount; the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.3 to 1.2% for r-hFSH and from 1.1 to 2.9% for r-hLH. The measured bioactivity of r-hFSH and r-hLH also corresponded closely with the target amount. Thus, both the measured protein content and in vivo bioactivity of r-hFSH and r-hLH in Ratio Groups 1–4 corresponded favourably with the target amounts.

Table 2 r-hFSH and r-hLH protein content and in vivo bioactivity of mixed solutions of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa
Full size table

Discussion

Infertility treatment protocols are individualized according to a variety of factors, including the patient's age and diagnosis, ovarian reserve and any co-administered medications. Owing to the complexity of treatment protocols, patients prefer to use the fewest possible number of steps to prepare each injection [7]. Accordingly, the ability to vary the FSH to LH dose ratio in a single injection is important for both physicians and patients.

The pharmacokinetics of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa administered individually or mixed together was first reported by le Cotonnec et al. [8–13]. The authors found no evidence of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa. More recently, it has been demonstrated that r-hLH and r-hFSH can be mixed together in the same syringe without compromising the bioactivity of the gonadotrophins [14], and administered successfully to patients [15]. Purified urinary gonadotrophin products can also be reconstituted and mixed together in a single syringe without affecting the FSH or LH bioactivity [16].

The present study was conducted to assess the feasibility of reconstituting follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder using currently marketed formulations of follitropin alfa FbM solution. The results demonstrate that follitropin alfa FbM either as 75 IU lyophilized powder or multi-dose solution from a prefilled pen may be mixed with follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder to produce solutions with ratios of follitropin alfa to lutropin alfa from 3:1 to 8:1.

Regulatory bodies designate that the Steelman-Pohley and Van Hell seminal vesicle weight gain in vivo bioassays are used to determine the gonadotrophin content of commercial FSH and LH products [5, 6]. However, the inherent lack of precision of these bioassays is well recognized [17–19]. To allow for this variability, it is specified in the United States Pharmacopeia, that gonadotrophin formulations should contain between 80% and 125% of the hormones listed on the product label [20].

In this study, the bioactivity of FSH and LH as assessed by the established in vivo bioassays fell well within these bounds. Thus, the bioactivity of FSH and LH was unaffected after mixing using plastic syringes and following the methodology described. The follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa protein content of the mixed solutions was also assessed by an accurate RP-HPLC assay, which confirmed the expected recoveries.

The flexibility in dosing ratios of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa afforded by mixing facilitates further individualization of therapy according to each patient's individual gonadotrophin requirements.

Conclusion

Follitropin alfa can be mixed accurately with follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa 150 IU/75 IU lyophilized powder to enable physicians to administer different ratios of r-hFSH and r-hLH in the IU range from 3:1 to 8:1. Mixing of recombinant formulations is expected to offer flexibility for patients receiving follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa for ART protocols in clinical practice.

References

  1. Hillier SG: Current concepts of the roles of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in folliculogenesis. Hum Reprod. 1994, 9: 188-191.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Somkuti SG, Schertz JC, Moore M, Ferrande L, Kelly E: Patient experience with follitropin alfa prefilled pen versus previously used injectable gonadotropins for ovulation induction in oligoanovulatory women. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006, 22: 1981-1996. 10.1185/030079906X132604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Porter R, Kissel C, Saunders H, Keck C: Patient and nurse evaluation of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone administration methods: comparison of two follitropin injection pens. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008, 24: 727-735. 10.1185/030079908X273291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pergoveris SPC. [http://emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/DisplayDoc.asp?DocumentID=20132]

  5. Steelman SL, Pohley FM: Assay of the follicle stimulating hormone based on the augmentation with human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology. 1953, 53: 604-616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Storring PL, Gaines Das RE: The fourth International Standard for Human Urinary FSH and LH: specificities of LH seminal vesicle weight gain assays in the collaborative study differ between laboratories. J Endocrinol. 2001, 171: 119-129. 10.1677/joe.0.1710119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G, Bergh C: Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004, 81: 258-261. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. le Cotonnec JY, Loumaye E, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Munafo A: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between recombinant human luteinizing hormone and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril. 1998, 69: 201-209. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00503-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. le Contonnec JY, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Khan A, Toon S, Rowland M: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. II. Single doses and steady state pharmacokinetics. Fertil Steril. 1994, 61: 679-686.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. le Cotonnec JY, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Khan A, Toon S, Rowland M: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). I. Comparative pharmacokinetics with urinary human FSH. Fertil Steril. 1994, 61: 669-678.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. le Cotonnec JY, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Munafo A: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human luteinizing hormone: Part II. Bioavailability of recombinant human luteinizing hormone assessed with an immunoassay and an in vitro bioassay. Fertil Steril. 1998, 69: 195-200. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00502-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. le Cotonnec JY, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, Munafo A: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human luteinizing hormone: Part I. Pharmacokinetics after intravenous administration to healthy female volunteers and comparison with urinary human luteinizing hormone. Fertil Steril. 1998, 69: 189-194. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00501-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Porchet HC, le Cotonnec JY, Loumaye E: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. III. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling after repeated subcutaneous administration. Fertil Steril. 1994, 61: 687-695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alper M, Meyer R, Dekkers C, Ezcurra D, Schertz J, Kelly E: Assessment of the biopotency of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa combined in one injection: a comparative trial in Sprague-Dawley rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008, 6: 31-10.1186/1477-7827-6-31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marrs R, Meldrum D, Muasher S, Schoolcraft W, Werlin L, Kelly E: Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004, 8: 175-182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scobey MJ, Raike E, Marshall DC: Mixed protocols: multiple ratios of FSH and LH bioactivity using highly purified, human-derived FSH (BRAVELLE) and highly purified hMG (MENOPUR) are unaltered by mixing together in the same syringe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005, 3: 61-10.1186/1477-7827-3-61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner D, Weissman A, Howles C, Shoham Z, Eds: Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives. 2004, London: Taylor and Francis

    Google Scholar 

  18. Driebergen R, Baer G: Quantification of follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa): is in vivo bioassay still relevant in the recombinant age?. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003, 19: 41-46. 10.1185/030079902125001344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lunenfeld B: Historical perspectives in gonadotrophin therapy. Hum Reprod Update. 2004, 10: 453-467. 10.1093/humupd/dmh044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 28-NF). 2004, Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeia Convention, 2274-2286.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data reported in this paper are the results of the technical contribution of Dr Mariagrazia Terlizzese, Fabrizio Martelli and Federica Bigliardi (Merck Serono S.p.A., Italy). The author would particularly like to thank Dr Alessandra Del Rio (Merck Serono S.p.A., Italy) and Dr Elly Kourany-Lefoll (Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva) for their support. The author also thanks Hannah Wills of Caudex Medical (supported by Merck Serono S.A. – Geneva) for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Merck Serono S.p.A., Via Luigi Einaudi 11, 00012 Guidonia Montecelio, Rome, Italy

    Rita Agostinetto

Authors
  1. Rita Agostinetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Agostinetto.

Additional information

Competing interests

Rita Agostinetto is an employee of Merck Serono S.p.A., Ardea, Italy. She works in the Pharmaceutical Development-Biotechnology Products Department and has experience of the development of injectable proteins, and a particular interest in gonadotrophins.

Authors' contributions

RA contributed to the study design, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and read and approved the final draft.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agostinetto, R. Administration of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa combined in a single injection: a feasibility assessment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7, 48 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-48

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-48

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us